Manuscript Section Guide and Index
Public Health Liberation is a rich and complex approach to understanding and affecting drivers of health inequity. A section guide and index are intended to guide the readers and serve as a referential document for future reading. Given the denseness of our discussion and the 20-30 minutes that are required for a thorough read, we suspect that readers will repeatedly return to master the constructs and theories. This guide is available for download on our website.
Be sure to disable pop-up to download pdf file.
Questions That PHL Theory Answers - Readers should be able to answer the following questions after reading the manuscript.
How are affected populations excluded from public health discourse and agenda-setting?
What are examples of structural violence and racism?
Why do the lead-contaminated water crises in Flint, Michigan and Washington, DC illustrate the need for public health à la PHL?
What is the public health economy important to study?
What liberation in the sense of public health? Why is it so important to PHL theoretical assumptions?
What are the components of PHL and how do they interact to advance health equity?
What is illiberation? Why is it a major barrier for achieving health equity based on PHL theory? What are causes of illiberation?
If a community sought to weaken structural inequity through policy changes, what are three broad categories of change that they should seek for elected and government officials to address? (Hint: theory of health inequity reproduction)
How and why do dominant powers within the political health economy seek to ensure that the public health economy undergoes no meaning shift toward health equity?
Why does health inequity persist?
What is the difference between anti-racism and liberation?
How is health inequity reproduced through human decision-making?
What is horizontal and vertical integration? How is it envisioned to accelerate health equity?
How does political theory elucidate challenges in the public health economy to explain persistent health disparities?
What is problematic about equity terms such as structural vulnerability and violence?
What is historical trauma and how does it remain relevant to persistent health inequity?
On what grounds would contemporary research studies on racial minorities and low-income populations be unethical?
Why is vibrant liberation safe spaces vital to PHL theory and practice?
What are ways that affected or vulnerable communities should deal with hegemonic influences?
How does estrangement in public health present a barrier to health inequity?
What are characteristics of PHL research?
Why are ethnic history, culture, and social identity important for PHL theory and practice?