The Hub. Submit your story.

Public Health Liberation wants to hear your stories.

Scroll to bottom of page to submit

 

Public Health Liberation is dedicated to elevating public health to be aligned with everyday experiences with health. This includes creative expression, news aggregation, and storytelling. We believe that pathways for improved community health is deeply embedded in being receptive and responsive to diverse human expression, communication, and needs. Public Health Liberation deeply values the indispensable role and contribution of women as the gateway for achieving health equity.

We want to share your story on health and well-being. We accept all perspectives and creative forms. We just require that your work is original and publishable on our website. We can also link to sources that you find compelling and relevant. Email info@publichealthliberation.com

Words Matter: Public Health Economy vs. Ecosystem
Chris Williams Chris Williams

Words Matter: Public Health Economy vs. Ecosystem

Public Health Liberation (PHL) theory instigated a debate as to the appropriate conceptual framing of public health. The PHL notion of the Public Health Economy contrasts with other conceptualizations, including the “public health ecosystem”. This debate is important because PHL posits that the Public Health Economy is a major economy equal to the traditional economy in significance and compelling government interest. This article argues that the Public Health Economy has many advantages over the “public health ecosystem” in theory and practice. The Public Health Economy best positions public health to achieve health equity and justice by recognizing that societal structures are failing to produce health outcomes consistent with growth and economic expansion. Transdisciplinary transformation à la Public Health Liberation theory wherein public health assumes leadership across the Public Health Economy is the new frontier of health equity.

Read More
Why So Little Transparency in Public Health Grant Spending?
Chris Williams Chris Williams

Why So Little Transparency in Public Health Grant Spending?

The lack of transparency in public health federal grant funding poses a major threat to the viability of public health to meet challenges in health and data equity. Websites for federal grant agencies do not contain ready access to successful applications, grant reports, related tools, and datasets. While much of these data can be obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, federal FOIA offices exercise considerable latitude to place limitations on public access. For example, I recently FOIA’ed to obtain the application for a $3.5 million funded federal grant application on LGBTQ+ mental health. The FOIA officer redacted 382 pages in full and only released 116 pages. The results provided the core of the grant activities, including consent forms and some assessments. The remaining 300-plus document was not released due to “trade secrets and commercial or financial information” and “information in personnel and medical files and similar files”. To gather data on any regular submitted reports to the agency or other pertinent information, I would need to submit a separate FOIA request. These practices that erect barriers to public data - the data that would be available under a FOIA request - is a hinderance to public health innovation.

Read More
Securing the Future of Public Health through Advocacy of the Public Health Economy
Chris Williams Chris Williams

Securing the Future of Public Health through Advocacy of the Public Health Economy

I recently received an action alert from a prominent medical education organization calling for increased federal funding for physician training programs. Addressing a shortage of up to 124,000 physicians in ten years will ensure access to patient care and readiness for the next public health crisis, claimed the organization. [1] This email prompted several critical reflections. First, their efforts can be understood as public health leadership. Hospital and physician organizations have a longstanding role in public health agenda-setting. Second, the extent of the US physician shortage is widely debated. For over ten years, I served as a medical education researcher and knew that the major accreditor for training programs differed significantly in their assessment - unofficially at least. I recall that the CEO remarked at its international conference several years ago that the urgency of physician shortages was not in the pipeline, but in the geographic distribution of physicians and lack of mid-level providers. In other words, we do not need to increase the rate of physicians entering the workforce as much as address the conditions leading to regional disparities in health care availability due to consolidation, closing of hospitals, and profit-driven health care.[2] “While only 14 percent of Americans—almost 46 million people—live in rural areas, rural communities represent nearly two-thirds of primary care health professional shortage areas (HPSAs) in the country.” [3] I also knew that the accreditor was prevented from political advocacy, unlike many major organizations in this space, because of limitations within its congressional authorization. Many medical education, hospital, and physician organizations encouraged the bipartisan laws in 2020 and 2022 that provide Medicare support for 1,200 residency positions. This new push is seeking to build on their prior legislative success.

Read More
Former CDC Directors on the Public Health Economy: Infrastructure is Broken
Chris Williams Chris Williams

Former CDC Directors on the Public Health Economy: Infrastructure is Broken

Former CDC directors gathered in April 2022 to discuss the state of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) - the leading federal public health research and response agency in the US. The Covid pandemic raised the profile and public criticism. They mostly limited their discussion to the traditional public health infrastructure of surveillance, public health research, and emergency preparedness and response. Their critical assessment of the CDC can be extrapolated to support Public Health Liberation (PHL) theory on disorder in the public health economy, which contravenes the public health commitment and capacity to address health inequity. Accelerating health equity particularly by income and race is the mission of Public Health Liberation. The challenges within the CDC are structural, political, and cultural, encumbered by underfunding and a lack of mission-driven strategic focus. By its own admission, “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) faces structural and systemic operational challenges, which were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic…However, since the pandemic, we also acknowledge that CDC is responsible for some large, public mistakes.”

Their discussion highlights the interaction of the political economy with public health aims and provide evidence of the assumptions of public health realism that posits hyper-competition and tensions to explain constraints on the CDC and the public health economy broadly. Rick Berke, Co-Founder and STAT Executive Editor moderated a critical dialogue among Bill Foege (CDC Director, 1977 to 1983), Tom Frieden (CDC Director, 2009 to 2017), Julie Gerberding (CDC Director, 2002 to 2009), Robert Redfield, (CDC Director, 2018 to 2021), and Bill Roper (CDC Director, 1990 to 1993). The purpose of this essay is to ground CDC challenges within PHL theory and practice.

Read More

Creative Arts.

 

“Maybe, we the project”

University professor and poetess PS Perkins reminds us about the humanity and lived experiences of families who live in public housing communities. She read her poem, “When a House is Not a Home” at the PHL National Webinar and Conversation on Liberation Philosophy, Systems Thinking, and Social Determinants of Health.

 

Documentary on Gentrification Captures Community Voices

Prior to starting Public Health Liberation,, Christopher Williams began an unfinished documentary to capture community voices in this gentrifying neighborhood of Washington, DC.

Submit to The Hub.

Please use the form below to submit. If you would rather include an attachment, please email phlhubsubmit@gmail.com.

Terms and Conditions: Upon submitting, you agree that you are the copyright holder or otherwise are legally entitled to submit for publication in The Hub and that you are truthfully representing your true or legal identity with the contact information that you include with your submission. You agree that the content is not published elsewhere. Once you submit to The Hub, we retain the ability to publish on our website and other promotional materials. You may request to remove content at any time.